With regard to the other correlational analyses, we found significant (two-tailed) relationships between experienced anxiety and psychological hardiness (total, commitment, and control). One aim of this study was to determine whether characteristics of psychological hardiness mediated the relationship between traits of psychopathy and experienced anxiety in a prison setting. Like the
correlation analyses, our mediation analysis (see Table 2 and Fig. 1), selleck products did not reveal any significant direct relationship between either F1 or F2 and anxiety. We did, however, find significant indirect effects mediated through the commitment dimension for both F1 and F2, but in reverse directions. This finding points to characteristics of commitment as a partial mediator of the relationship between psychopathy and anxiety. The opposite direction effects for F1 and F2 emphasize the heterogeneity of the psychopathy construct. Partly through high levels of commitment, F1 traits (interpersonal and emotional detachment) seem to protect against anxiety, while F2 traits (unstable and antisocial), partly through lower levels of commitment, seem to be a risk factor for experiencing anxiety. While interesting, it is important to note that the mediation effect of commitment is GSI-IX supplier only partial, with a modest effect
size (F1 k2 = .112; F2 k2 = .155). However, by explaining a little over one-tenth of the relationship, it still represents a significant contribution that has not previously been shown. Our findings concerning how personality variables (i.e., psychopathy and psychological hardiness) are associated with experienced anxiety in a prison setting might suggest that the stressor of incarceration does not affect the psychological well-being of all individuals equally (Bukstel & Kilmann, 1980). Traits of both psychopathy and
psychological hardiness seem to act as resiliency factors in relation to anxiety that might also act as a buffer against other adverse health effects of stress. This protective feature only seems to be related to some characteristics of psychopathy, however, namely interpersonal and emotional many detachment (PCL-R F1). This resiliency against anxiety related to F1 seems to correspond to Cleckley’s original connotation of psychopathy, and to what is also called primary psychopathy (Cleckley, 1976, Karpman, 1948 and Skeem et al., 2011). That PCL-2 F2, with its focus on antisocial behavior, is found to be more positively related to anxiety coincides with other findings of strong comorbidity between Antisocial Personality Disorder (ASPD) and anxiety disorders (Goodwin & Hamilton, 2003). Antisocial behavior can also be a symptom/indication of other mental disorders, including anxiety (Goodwin and Hamilton, 2003 and Karpman, 1948).