Using exploratory factor analysis on an individual item level, two studies obtained a five factor solution (Tuttle et al 1991, Swartzman et al 1994). Recognising the small samples used in previous studies, item level exploratory factor analysis was performed on the CSQ from a large sample of 965 patients CLBP revealing a six factor solution similar to the subscales originally derived in the CSQ (Robinson et al 1997). Riley and Robinson (1997) compared the five and six factor solutions for the CSQ using linear structural equation modelling. From the results, Riley and Robinson (1997) recommended a
revision of the coping strategy http://www.selleckchem.com/products/BMS-754807.html questionnaire (CSQ-R) retaining 27 items from the original CSQ. This included all six items of the catastrophising subscale, five items from each of the ignoring IPI-145 datasheet pain and reinterpreting
pain sensations subscales, four items from coping self-statements and diverting attention subscales, and three items related to praying factors. In a recent study on patients with cancer related pain, Utne et al (2009) also showed less factorial variance in the CSQ-R than the original CSQ and recommends the CSQ-R for use in clinical research. Monitoring coping strategies is of clinical importance as they have been shown to mediate the influence of pain
intensity on functional disability and quality of life (Abbott et al 2010) and to influence the adjustment of pain (Rosenstiel & Keefe 1983). The CSQ has been shown to be valid for use in several different patient groups such as osteoarthritis, knee replacement surgery, rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia, low back pain, lumbar spine surgery, and even cancer-related pain. The CSQ is a useful clinical tool for the screening of coping styles. It provides information for patients and clinicians on the efficacy of coping strategies Phosphoprotein phosphatase and those strategies needing addressing to help facilitate pain control and mediate improvement of functional outcomes. Data on the CSQ-R sensitivity of change is lacking. More research using the CSQ-R is needed to improve the questionnaire’s validity as an outcome measure and provide more extensive normative data. “
“Latest update: February 2009. Next update: Not specifically stated, but will be planned when the evidence base has progressed sufficiently to alter the guideline. Patient group: Individuals diagnosed with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). Intended audience: UK healthcare professionals, people with RA and their carers, patient support groups, community organisations, and service providers.