Patients and Methods Patients with refractory metastatic canc

\n\nPatients and Methods Patients with refractory metastatic cancer had tissue samples submitted for MP in two formats including formalin-fixed tissue for immunohistochemistry and fluorescent in situ hybridization assays

and immediately frozen tissue for oligonucleotide microarray (MA) gene expression assays (all performed in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments [CLIA] -certified laboratory). The MP approach was deemed of clinical benefit for the individual patient who had a PFS ratio (PFS on MP-selected therapy/PFS on prior therapy) of >= 1.3.\n\nResults In 86 patients who had MP attempted, there was a molecular target detected in 84 (98%). Sixty-six of https://www.selleckchem.com/products/gsk2879552-2hcl.html the 84 patients were treated according to MP results. Eighteen (27%) of 66 patients had a PFS ratio of >= 1.3 (95% Cl, 17% to 38%; one-sided, one-sample P = .007). Therefore, the null hypothesis (that <= 15% of this patient population would have a PFS ratio of >= 1.3) was rejected.\n\nConclusion It is possible to identify molecular

targets in patients’ tumors from nine different centers across the United States. In 27% of patients, the MP approach resulted in a longer PFS on an MP-suggested regimen than on the Pexidartinib clinical trial regimen on which the patient had just experienced progression. Issues to be considered in interpretation of this study include limited prior experience with patients as their own controls as a study end point and overall patient attrition. J Clin Oncol 28:4877-4883. (c) 2010 by American Society of Clinical Oncology”
“Object. The authors retrospectively analyzed and compared seizure

outcome in a series of 28 patients with temporomesial glioneuronal tumors associated with epilepsy who underwent 1 of 2 different epilepsy surgery procedures: lesionectomy or tailored resection.\n\nMethods. The 28 patients were divided into 2 groups, with 14 cases in each group. In Group A, surgery was limited to the tumor (lesionectomy), whereas Group B patients underwent tailored GSK1838705A chemical structure resection involving removal of the tumor and the epileptogenic zone as identified by a neurophysiological noninvasive presurgical study.\n\nResults. In Group A (10 male and 4 female patients) the interval between onset of seizures and surgery ranged from 1 to 33 years (mean 10.6 years). Patients’ ages ranged from 3 to 61 years (mean 23.1 years). The epileptogenic lesion was on the left side in 6 patients and the right in 8 patients. Mean follow-up was 9.8 years (range 6.5-15 years). The Engel classification system, used to determine postoperative seizure outcome, showed 6 patients (42.8%) were Engel Class I and 8 (57.1%) were Engel Class II. In Group B (6 male and 8 female patients) the interval between onset of seizures and surgery ranged from 0.5 to 25 years (mean 8.6 years). Patients’ ages ranged from 3 to 48 years (mean 22.3 years).

Comments are closed.