METHODS: Self-reported data on HRQOL PCI-34051 (physical and mental function, anxiety, depression, and fatigue) were analyzed for 319 survivors of aggressive NHL. Survivors 2 to 5 years postdiagnosis were selected from the Los Angeles County Cancer Registry. Bivariate and multivariable methods were used to assess the influence of sociodemographic, clinical, and cognitive health-appraisal factors on survivors’ HRQOL. RESULTS: After accounting for other covariates, marital status was associated with all HRQOL outcomes (P < .05).

Younger survivors reported worse mental function and higher levels of depression, anxiety, and fatigue (P < .01). Survivors who had more comorbid conditions or lacked private health insurance reported worse physical and mental function

and higher levels of depression and fatigue (P < .05). Survivors who experienced a recurrence reported worse physical function and higher levels of depression and Pexidartinib clinical trial fatigue (P < .05). With the exception of a nonsignificant association between perceived control and physical function, greater perceptions of personal control and health competence were associated significantly with more positive HRQOL outcomes (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicated that survivors of aggressive NHL who are younger, are unmarried, lack private insurance, or experience greater illness burden may be at risk for poorer HRQOL. Cognitive health-appraisal factors were strongly related

to HRQOL, suggesting potential benefits of interventions focused on these mutable factors for this population. Cancer 2013. (C) 2012 American Cancer Society.”
“We retrospectively examined the efficacy and safety of S-1 alone or S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) for elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer because the benefit of adding SB273005 chemical structure cisplatin in these patients still remains unclear.\n\nAmong 175 patients aged 70 years or older who received S-1 alone or SP as a first-line therapy between April 2000 and November 2010 at our institution, 104 patients who met eligibility criteria were examined. We investigated safety and efficacy of S-1 and SP.\n\nAmong these 104 patients, 73 patients received S-1 and 31 patients received SP. The median age was 75 years in the S-1 group and 74 years in the SP group. The response rate was 26.3 % in the S-1 group and 44.0 % in the SP group. Major grade 3 or higher adverse events were observed as follows (S-1 vs. SP): nausea (1.4 vs. 16.1 %), anorexia (16.4 vs. 41.9 %), neutropenia (4.1 vs. 35.5 %), and febrile neutropenia (0 vs. 9.7 %). The median overall survival (OS) was 10.4 months in the S-1 group and 17.8 months in the SP group. Treatment of SP and histology of intestinal type were detected as independent, good prognostic factors in multivariate analysis.\n\nSP might improve OS with some added toxicity compared to S-1 alone in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer.