CP inhibits T-cell activation both in vitro and in vivo by disruption of the TCR at the membrane level. To elucidate CP interactions with lipids, surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and circular dichroism (CD) were used to examine CP binding and secondary structure in the presence of either the anionic dimyristoyl-L-alpha-phosphatidyl-DL-glycerol (DMPG), or the zwitterionic selleckchem dimyristoyl-L-alpha-phoshatidyl choline (DMPC).\n\nUsing lipid monolayers and bilayers, SPR experiments demonstrated that irreversible peptide-lipid binding required the hydrophobic

interior provided by a membrane bilayer. The importance of electrostatic interactions between CP and phospholipids was highlighted on lipid monolayers as CP bound reversibly to anionic DMPG monolayers, with no detectable binding observed on neutral DMPC monolayers.\n\nCD revealed a dose-dependent conformational change of CP from a dominantly random coil structure to that of beta-structure as the concentration of lipid increased relative to CP. This occurred only in the presence of the anionic DMPG at a lipid peptide molar ratio of 1.6: 1 as no conformational change was observed when the zwitterionic DMPC was tested up to a lipid peptide ratio of 8.4 : 1. Copyright (C) 2008 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.”
“Purpose\n\nHistone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis) have been shown to overcome resistance

to epidermal CDK inhibition growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) linked to epigenetic changes and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) state. This randomized phase II study evaluated the outcome of erlotinib with and without the isoform selective HDACi, entinostat.\n\nPatients and Methods\n\nPreviously treated patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer, no prior JNK-IN-8 price EGFR-TKIs, and performance status <= 2 were randomly administered erlotinib 150 mg on days 1 through 28 plus entinostat 10 mg orally on days 1 and 15 every 28 days (EE) or erlotinib plus placebo (EP). The primary end point was 4-month progression-free survival (PFS)

rate with additional end points including 6-month PFS rate, PFS, and overall survival (OS). Exploratory analyses included EMT- and EGFR-related biomarker analysis on archival tissue.\n\nResults\n\nOne hundred thirty-two patients were enrolled (EE, 67; EP, 65). The 4-month PFS rate was comparable for both groups (EE, 18% v EP, 20%; P = .7). In the subset of patients with high E-cadherin levels, OS was longer in the EE group compared with the EP group (9.4 v 5.4 months; hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.92; P = .03) with a corresponding trend toward increased PFS. The adverse event (AE) profile was acceptable, with rash, fatigue, diarrhea, and nausea the most common AEs in both groups.\n\nConclusion\n\nErlotinib combined with entinostat did not improve the outcomes of patients in the overall study population when compared with erlotinib monotherapy.