The results are indicated in Fig. 1. The isolated DNA was assessed for yield and purity by obtaining OD ratios at 260 nm/280 nm

(DNA/Protein) and 260 nm/230 nm selleck chemicals llc (DNA/humic acid). Comparative analysis revealed the considerable variations in yield and purity of DNA obtained by the different methods. As depicted in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3, method 1 gave DNA with A260/A280 ratios close to optimum, while A260/A230 ratios indicating comparatively reduced humic content was obtained by method 2. Although the quantity of total DNA isolated by the different methods varied considerably, the extracted DNA were of high molecular weight, which was also a DNA quality indicator. The spectophotometric data were supported by the agarose gel analysis. (Fig. 4). Lower DNA concentration obtained by method 2 was clearly visible in the gel picture. PCR amplification of 16S rRNA gene was successful only with DNA obtained by method 2 (Fig. 5), which had comparatively reduced humic acid contaminants. To isolate high molecular weight, contaminant free and PCR amplifiable DNA, five Doxorubicin in vitro different methods of total DNA isolation were utilised. Various environmental DNA isolation protocols have been previously studied [10] and [11]. Extracting pure DNA from environmental samples is practically as important as yield, however it is also one of the most complex problems associated

with the application

of molecular techniques on environmental samples. Heterogeneous nature of the environmental samples requires each extraction procedure to be precise and optimised for every soil sample. Most DNA extraction procedures co-extract humic acids, pigments, heavy metals, and other contaminants. Humic contaminants due to their three dimensional structure and functional reactive groups bind with organic compounds [12] and are therefore one of the major problems associated with any soil community DNA isolation. Depending on soil types, crude Thiamine-diphosphate kinase DNA extracts can be contaminated by approximately 0.7–3.3 μg/μL of humic acid [13]. In addition, due to similar physicochemical properties with nucleic acid they easily co-precipitate with nucleic acid. These contaminants may not only hinder PCR reactions acting as inhibitor, but also can degrade the DNA during storage. Humic acid may through specific binding to DNA inhibit amplification in PCR reactions by limiting the amount of available template [14]. Purification of DNA employing polyvinylpolypyrrolidone, embedding DNA in agarose blocks followed by successive washing steps or by using sephadex columns can help improve quality of soil DNA and subsequent PCR amplification [15], [16] and [17]. The aim of any extraction protocol is to succeed in obtaining genomic DNA which is a representative of the microbial diversity present within a soil.