These findings highlight the importance of simplifying exercise p

These findings highlight the importance of simplifying exercise prescription to enhance adherence to exercise. The association between two or fewer sessions per week and lower levels of adherence may seem counterintuitive. However, with only one session per week, participants may doubt the efficacy of the program. This concept is outlined in the Health Belief Model (Janz and Becker 1984), where the perceived efficacy of the intervention affects participants’ perceived benefits of, and thus compliance with, the

intervention. Second, more frequent contacts per week may facilitate increased socialising between participants, thus increasing benefits of engaging in the program that are unrelated to fall prevention. Third, selection bias may have influenced the result. Studies that advertise more intensive programs are more likely to recruit people who are interested and familiar mTOR inhibitor Proteasome inhibitor with exercise. This may result in a higher level of adherence being associated with more frequent sessions per week (Russell et al 2009). Other factors analysed were deemed as non-significant. However, this may

be explained by the limited number of papers included in the meta-regression. The same method utilising a greater number of data sets would be likely to yield more conclusive results. Further research in this area is recommended to ascertain more precisely the effect of other intervention-level factors on adherence. Our analysis

suggests attendance at group exercise programs for the prevention of falls is about 74% of the total number of sessions. Nyman and Victor (2012) reported similar figures: adherence rates for class-based exercise were initially 83%, but dropped to 76% over 24 months. Our figure of 74% is higher than has previously been reported for compliance to home exercise programs for falls prevention, but is still submaximal (Simek et al 2012). Attention must be placed on addressing the interventionlevel and patient-level determinants of compliance to facilitate maximum attendance. Also, practitioners will need to consider this figure of expected adherence when designing an intervention, and compromise between the amount of exercise likely to result in gains in physical functioning with the estimated Mephenoxalone degree of adherence. It is also important to note that this figure must be viewed with some caution due to the large amounts of heterogeneity still observed after subgroup analyses. The relationship between adherence and falls prevention efficacy was explored. There was no significant association between adherence and the efficacy of the intervention. This is counter to the impressions of the researchers, as medical literature has outlined the effect of lower rates of adherence to pharmacological interventions, and identified that non-compliant patients routinely experience poorer health outcomes (Foody et al 2007, Hawthorne et al 2008).

Comments are closed.